Umno's Mockery Of Hudud Law by: Nash Ar-Rawy

Umno’s Mockery Of Hudud Law By: Nash Ar-Rawy
Hudud Law is only meant for the muslims. But Umno makes it a mockery by saying that there will be chaos in this country if Hudud Law is being implemented because Malaysia is a multi-racial and multi- religion country.
Whereas Hudud Law has got nothing to do with the non –muslims since they could easily opt to the present British Colonial Common Law or Civil Law for that matter. Which is not even a Chinese, or an Indian Law or even a Christian, Hindu or Buddhist Laws in reality.
Being a democratic country , Hudud Law i.e. The Syariah Criminal Enactment 11 was passed by the Kelantan State Assembly in 1993 and The Syariah Criminal Enactment was passed by the Terengganu State Assembly in 2003 respectively. This is in accordance with the procedures of democracy engaged by PAS in its Islamic political course and plights which is contradicted with the speeches of Umno leaders right from Tunku till Najib. Such as Hudud will stop development and not all Muslim States implement Hudud. Making it a plain mockery and a criminal defamations toward God as The Absolute Law Giver , Islam and the muslims at large.
Umno says, “ Hudud in Kelantan and Terengganu is PAS’s Hudud” and where is Umno’s Hudud? . Umno says, “ Hudud is in the Qur’an “ but any lay man for that matter (not law-man) will tell Hudud in the Al-qur’an and the Al –Hadis ( Traditions of the prophet ) must be legalized first in the State Assembly and in the parliament as such Umno is the blockate of Hudud Law all these while by sending a letter of threat to the Kelantan Government not to implement Hudud. Thus, Hudud had been a mockery of Umno.
When Mahathir said,” Why TGNA not implementing it when he’s no more the PM “ has proven that he had bulshited all the yes man leaders and followers of Umno that Umno is the biggest Islamic party in Malaysia but he himself makes Hudud a mockery and played escapism whereas Hudud is the responsibility of all muslims to practice it as to the 5 time prayer , pilgrimage, zakat and fasting as obligatory practices as ordained in the Qur’an.
Any where we go in the world , one will never find a Buddhist Court, a Hindu Court , a Christian Court or a Judaism Court for that matter . But for the muslims there’s such religious court known as The Syariah Criminal Law pertaining to i) Hudud Law i.e. i) Syariqah( burglary), ii) Hirabah( Arms Robbery ), iii) Syurb( Intoxicants), iv) Adultery, v) Qozaf( Accussations of adultery and Sodomy without four eye-witnessses ) and vi) Apostacy which is only meant for the followers of Islam i.e. Muslims . Even the Medina Charter of the prophet First Benevolent Government in Islam did not abide the Jews , Christians and pagans to follow ii) Qisos ( Batteries and causes of injuries ) and iii) Taazir ( Judge verdict not beyond Hudud punishment which is not in Hudud or Qisos ) such as drugs crime which is not supposed to be hanged right away as in the present Civil Law or pardoned a hang sentence except for the benefacaries consent with a certain amount of compensations agreed upon by both parties.
The idea of Hudud is to protect the muslims i) Faith, ii) healthy and sober mind iii) lives from being raped or murdered , iv) genuine and clean siblings and v) protect the property . Thus Islamic Law is not to punish but to educate the people and their sins being pardoned if they were to be sincere . acceptable and surrender to God in return they are free from the sins committed in the hereafter. An Islamic System of a Benevolent Government is not merely in this world ( unlike Umno until 2020) but until the hereafter as our future and eternal world or the actual permanent state we are heading to.
But Umno’s hudud mockeries have created fear amongst the muslims themselves condemning without understanding . But with PAS out-reaching of the true teachings of Islam right from its first President Tuan Hj Fuad 60 years ago i.e. in 1951 PAS was formed in Butterworth That was when The Ulamaks left Umno and formed PAS for they didn’t agree with gamblings approved by Umno till now which is different from Kelantan.
PAS leadership was then taken by a modern time ulamak who wrote the book on “ Symposium Tasauf “ was well respected of his depth religious knowledge who was also the first Malay Doctor in Homeopathy medicine i.e. Professor Doctor Burhanuddin Al Helmy and his Deputy , Professor Doctor Zulkifly Muhammad. Prof. Dr. Burhanuddin once was invited for an international meeting known as The Asia-Africa Conference for the first time held ; where he was the only one representing Asia and Malaya and South East Asia for that matter as one of the masses freedom fighters leader against colonizations and imperialism
Now after 60 years , there are many professionals, doctors, engineers, lawyers, lecturers, professors, and ulamaks as well hand in hand in PAS plights for a Benevolent State . Ulamaks and Professionals as ONE entity which attracted the non –muslims as well to join in a universal course of non-racist , primordial , clean, just and fair to everybody regardless of race and religion . As a matter a fact unexpectedly PAS has formed a new wing called “ PAS SUPPORTERS WING which was once given a hint by Prof. Dr. Zulkifly Muhammad and now became a reality comprised of about 20,000 non-muslims; PAS Benevolent State of Kelantan being its model of a good governance , zero –corruptions recognized by International bodies such as Transparency International
Suprisingly, unlike Umno ‘s drama with MCA and Gerakan Hudud’s Mockeries. Where Umno did not revoke Terengganu Hudud under Umno rule now and MCA and Gerakan did not withdraw from BN as for the Syariah Criminal Enactment in Terengganu being accepted by them since 2003. Whereas DAP and PKR and PAKATAN acknowledged the Hudud Law approved in Kelantan and Terengganu prior to the formation of Pakatan Rakyat. Congratulations Pakatan ! killed Umno stratagies stabbing itself for good ! Promote Orange Book and Pakatan Rakyat Common Policy Platform for a New Malaysia !
In the matter of DAP , PKR and PAS interpretations of the Civil Criminal Law, Federal Constitution and the Syariah Criminal Enactment in particular to be implemented in Kelantan; have plenty of rooms to be discussed with .With the acknowledgement of Pakatan towards Hudud in Kelantan and Trengganu . It could be proceeded fairly through a “ Constitution Court” yet to be formed in considering that Religion Is within the absolute power of the Sultans and States without Sultans is the Agong. And Islam is the official religion of Malaysia in its real meaning not secularized i.e. Islam as i) “ Ad-deen Waddaulah and ii) Ad-deen wa syariah “ promoting A Benevolent Islamic System of Good Governance and just to all and other religions are free to practice there to.
With all due respect to all the non-muslims as a whole and PAS SUPPORTERS WING , DAP and PKR. PAS will never enforced the Hudud Law towards the non-muslims as ordained in the Holy Qur’an “ La iqra hafiddeen “ ( There is no compulsion in religion) i.e. upon the non-muslims but only to the muslims being made obligatory as practicing their faith .Thus, The Islamic System is fair to everybody regardless of Religion and Race for it is performed with the spirit of : Rahmatan Lil “Alameen” ( A blesseth From God To the Whole World ) . “ Selamat Menyambut 60 Tahun PAS “ Syabbas!!!
By: Nash Ar-Rawy /1.10.11 TO: www.malaysiatimes.my
FROM: www.nasharrawy.blogspot.com

MALAYSIA'S BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY'S FLAG ! A PLAIN COPYCAT NOT ORI NOT NATIONALISTIC AT ALL
( APPROVED BY THE KING OF ENGLAND IN 1950.
Incidentally, the Jalur Gemilang (leaving out its several minor modifications following the merger of Malaya with Sarawak, Sabah and Singapore, and the subsequent expulsion of Singapore) was – NOW GET THIS – approved by King George VI on 19 May 1950.

And you can bet George VI certainly wasn't the Sultan of Bolehland.

For those who still don’t believe Malaya was a British colony (de facto or otherwise), eat that fact.

The Malayan/Malaysian flag was designed by Mohamad Hamzah who was said to have borrowed and then modified the design from the flag of the British East India Company, a rapacious trading organization.


Even the name Jalur Gemilang came only into being in 1997 when then-PM Dr Mahathir picked it from a list of proposed names for the flag. Wasn't that naming a change in itself?

Manoharan has been absolutely correct in calling for the redesign of our national flag. Let’s follow the Canadian example, but most of all let’s get rid of any association with the British colonial empire, King George VI and the terrible British East India Company.

As for the low brow ethnic pseudo-warrior, who accused Manoharan’s proposal as likely to lead to changes to the Constitution, let me remind that beetle the Constitution has been changed a couple of hundred times already, by his